By the Grace of G-d 21st of Shevat, 5747 Brooklyn, N.Y.
Greeting and Blessing:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter of the . . ., in which you write about the project of a village for special adolescents and adults, etc.
Since you sign your letter a "Volunteer," it is not quite clear in what capacity you have written this letter. However, considering the importance of the matter, I am replying to your letter without waiting for a clarification, especially as this is not really material in this case. The point is as follows: Judging by your description of the purpose and scope of the project, it is my considered opinion that such a project should be undertaken as a general (universal) cause, on its own merits. By this I mean that it should not be made an adjunct to, or part of, other projects or programs; nor should it be identified with any particular organization, or party, political or otherwise, or any movement, whether Chassidim or Misnagdim, etc. - for obvious reasons. The most obvious one is that if it were so identified, it would immediately limit its appeal to those who are in sympathy with a particular organization, but it would lose support of others, even though the project in itself would be quite appealing to them on universal considerations.
A further point, which I believe should be considered, is the matter of location. In addition to the limitation that a location such as . . . would impose, since it would immediately be identified with a project of . . . , etc., the people for whom the village is intended have enough problems without the additional complications of being located in the . . . area.
I trust there is no need for further elaboration, as I am sure you can well understand my personal position in regard to the said project.
With blessing,
Notes and sources
Published: Teshura, (Wenger 7 Sivan, 5771).
Note: This letter is from the Archives of Rabbi Nissan Mindel A"H, the Rebbe's personal secretary entrusted with writing up the Rebbe's orally dictated responses. The “Nissan Mindel Archives” are comprised of secretarial copies, including first drafts, and may have subsequently been published with editorial changes. Therefore the letter as it appears here may not be the final signed version.