By the Grace of G-dRosh Chodesh Shevat, 5739Brooklyn, N.Y.
Greeting and Blessing:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter, which I read with much astonishment.
Firstly, it is well known that as a matter of practice and indeed of principle, and for a variety of reasons, I have nothing to do with politics, nor do I delegate representatives to speak in my name at any political meetings, least of all one with an agenda as you refer to in your letter. I cannot understand how anyone can have any doubts about something so well known and obvious.
Secondly, with all due respect, I must take exception to the manner of making accusations about other people and prejudging them at the same time. In such a case it is my duty according to the Shulchan Aruch, as indeed is the duty of everyone else, to point out that where Jews are concerned, any accusation, especially a serious one, should be brought before a Rabbinic authority who, after hearing all the pertinent details, can then make a judgment in accordance with the halacha. Needless to say, an involved party; whoever he may be, has no prerogative to make an impartial judgment in such a case. It is also well known that it is not one of my functions to pasken sha’alos or arbitrate in cases of dispute.
Finally, I must regretfully add that I resent the tone of your letter, particularly the last paragraph. Though I would not presume to expect everyone to follow my approach, I do believe that the way to make a point is through logical argumentation and persuasion. The approach you chose in your letter is all the more disappointing inasmuch as it is out of harmony with the impression I gained from our meeting and brief exchange during a Farbrengen.
With blessing,
Notes and sources
Published: The Letter and the Spirit, Vol 4 (Nissan Mindel Publications, 2017), 130.
Note: Letters printed in "The Letter and the Spirit" are from the Archives of Rabbi Nissan Mindel A"H, the Rebbe's personal secretary entrusted with writing up the Rebbe's orally dictated responses. The “Nissan Mindel Archives” are comprised of secretarial copies, including first drafts, and may have subsequently been published with editorial changes. Therefore the letters as they appear in the book may not be the final signed version.